sense oppose nse development in Chalfont St Peter
Chalfont St. Peter Community and:-             
The NSE's £100
M+ Developments on Green Belt land
sense Comment on:
CDC's Case Officer's Report on the NSE's Planning Application 2004/859/CH heard on 2 September 2004
  Home
Info  
  Home > Information > Planning Application > CDC Planning Committee > Case Officer's Report 
The Chiltern District Council (CDC) Planning Case Officer, Mr Ray Martin, prepared a report to be considered by the Planning Committee of CDC on 2 September 2004 when making a decision on whether or not to allow the NSE's application.  This report drew together representations from the interested parties and made a recommendation to the Committee based on planning considerations, particularly adherence (or otherwise) to the Local Plan.   sense reproduce this report hereunder, together with our observations and comments.
     
  CDC Case Officer's Report   sense's Comments
     
HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES
Main List of Applications - 02/09/2004 - 2004/859/CH
Case Officer: Ray Martin
Date received: 15/05/2004 Decide by date: 29/06/2004
Parish: Chalfont St Peter: Ward: Chalfont Common
App Type: Outline Application
Proposal: REDEVELOPMENT OF PART OF SITE TO PROVIDE REPLACEMENT EPILEPSY CENTRE INCLUDING 60 NURSING HOME BED SPACES, 80 RESIDENTIAL HOMES AND 12 REHABILITATION BED SPACES FOR PEOPLE WITH EPILEPSY; 50 UNITS OF STAFF ACCOMMODATION AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES. REDEVELOPMENT OF PART OF SITE FOR UP TO 218 PRIVATE DWELLINGS, ONE PRIVATE NURSING HOME AND ONE PRIVATE SHELTERED HOUSING BLOCK. NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS ONTO CHESHAM LANE AND RICKMANSWORTH LANE
Location: NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EPILEPSY CHALFONT CENTRE CHESHAM LANE CHALFONT ST. PETER
Applicant: THE NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EPILEPSY
 




  




A more appropriate description of the proposal is:
REDEVELOPMENT OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE NSE's EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE IN PART FOR THE NSE's OPERATIONS AND IN PART FOR THE PROVISION OF NEW EXTERNAL HOUSING TOGETHER WITH AN ENTIRELY NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE THE EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE.   Etc.

     
SITE CONSTRAINTS

Green Belt other than GB4 or GB5 settlementClass C Road
Southern Electricity - supply capability query
Area of Special Advertisement Control
Mineral Consultation Area
Tree Preservation Order
Public Footpath/Bridleway
Within curtilage of Listed Building - affects setting

Dwellings
Total New Dwellings - proposed:
268
Total Dwellings - displaced/demolished:


RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
AM/0645/52 Rebuilding part of kitchen, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/0950/52 Erection of bungalow, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/0549/60 Additions to administrations centre, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/0359/61 Additional Staff accommodation, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/1610/61 Erection for house for Night Charge Nurse, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/1759/63 Permission for house for night nurse, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/0398/64 Outline permission for bungalows, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/0410/64 Outline permission for the erection of one pair semi-detached bungalows for nursing and medical staff, Nicholls Ave. Approved
AM/1137/64 Erection of two bungalows, Nicholls Ave. Approved

AM/1002/67

20 detached bungalows and access to serve development from Rickmansworth Lane. Approved

AM/0514/68

20 detached bungalows and access to serve development from Rickmansworth Lane. Approved
AM/0186/72
Notice of proposed workshop and office building. Accepted
AM/1169/73
Single storey extension to main kitchen to provide proper kitchen room, store, restroom etc. Approved

AM/1162/73

Outline application for 20 detached bungalows and estate roads at Chesham Lane. Approved
CH/0125/77 Erection of 6 semidetached bungalows to replace 3 semidetached bungalows. Approved


CH/0540/78

Single storey extension to staff social club for use as club room at Ley House. Approved
CH/2232/78 Use of premises for playgroup at Lakeman House. Approved


CH/1968/80

Erection of pre-fabricated building for use as additional day accommodation for patients. Approved
CH/1802/81 Outline Application for the erection of building for accommodation of single nursing staff off Nicholls Ave. Approved

CH/2057/81

Erection of sheltered accommodation for the physically disabled. Approved

CH/1932/82 Erection of building for sheltered accommodation for the physically disabled and to the creation of access and constriction of driveway and parking area off Rickmansworth Lane. Approved
CH/0092/83 Outline Application for the demolition of Garden Cottage and erection of six residential staff bungalows and ten garages off Penn Gaskell Lane. Approved

CH/1238/83

Single storey side extension for snooker room ancillary use to the building as social club at Ley House. Approved

85/2312/CH Retention of fabricated building for use as additional day accommodation for patients (renewal of planning permission CH/1968/80). Approved
86/0264/CH Retention of two street lights at Sarcus Dean. Approved
86/1088/CH Alterations and single storey side extension to form residential accommodation for 10 disabled persons. Approved.
89/3571/CH Erection of building to provide doctors surgery at land opposite Tragenma and Wandswood. Refused Permission.
91/0806/CH
Demolish existing day centre and erect new day centre. Approved.
91/1280/CH Alterations, single storey extension and formation of car park at Debenham House. Approved
91/1459/CH Demolition of pre-fabricated building that is used as day centre and the erection of new day centre. Approved.
92/1443/CH Certificate of Lawfulness of existing use of development: Use of the building for retail nursery/ horticultural use is only incidental to the use as residential institution for women, class C2. Certificate of Lawfulness granted.
93/0840/CH Single storey side extension to Penn House and Princess of Wales House. Approved.
93/1115/CH Demolish existing building and erect single storey building to provide magnetic resonance imaging and ancillary facilities and car parking. Approved.
94/1372/CH Erection of four portakabins in two units to provide additional changing facilities for a temp period of 5 years for the playing fields/ Refused Permission
96/0080/CH Erection of single storey building to provide diagnostic treatment centre. Approved.
96/0513/CH Demolition of existing therapeutic workshop and erection of detached single storey building to provide replacement therapeutic workshop. Withdrawn
96/1127/CH Demolition of existing therapeutic workshop and erection of detached single storey building to provide replacement therapeutic workshop with car parking. Approved
97/0491/CH Siting of demountable building for a temporary period of 9 months at Chesham Lane. Approved
98/1528/CH Listed building consent and conservation area consent, Passmore Edwards House. Approved
00/1490/CH Single storey building to provide an assessment and treatment centre (amendment to planning permission 96/80/CH). Approved
04/0082/CH Removal of Modern Flue stack and dress back to make good. Approved

04/1030/CH

Redevelopment of part of site to provide replacement epilepsy centre including 60 nursing home bed spaces, 80 residential homes and 12 rehabilitation bed spaces for people with epilepsy; 50 units of staff accommodation and associated facilities. Redevelopment of part of site for up to 218 private dwellings, one private nursing home and one private sheltered housing block. New vehicular access onto Chesham lane and Rickmansworth lane. (Appeal against non-determination lodged.)

 

















The NSE have made many applications on planning matters to the regulatory authorities over a long period of time.  They have, to date, a good track record of submitting reasonable applications that have been approved.

     
THE APPLICATION
The application seeks outline planning permission to redevelop the National Society for Epilepsy site at Chalfont St Peter (NSE) and associated facilities, residential and private care home development, identified as 'enabling development' together with associated infrastructure. The application site comprises 20.24 hectares.

All matters are reserved with the exception of means of access. The application proposes an additional single point of access onto Chesham Lane. The access to the Tate Road houses is to be retained. In addition the vehicular access from Rickmansworth Lane is to be improved.

The application comprises two elements:
(i)  the NSE redevelopment
(ii) the enabling development
Illustrative plans have been submitted for both aspects of the proposed development.

(i)   The NSE redevelopment
The principal elements of the NSE redevelopment component of the application are as follows:-
152 residential units for the care of those with complex epilepsy.  These comprise:
a) 60 nursing home bed-spaces made up of 48 bed spaces in three blocks of 16 units and 12 bed spaces provided by the conversion of the existing medical centre on site;
b) 80 residential homes in clusters of four units;
c) 12 rehabilitation bed spaces in one and two bedroom flats;
In addition, 50 units of staff accommodation are proposed.

Also included are:
-
A "residents centre" to provide a therapy centre, disability gym, day care services, massage and OT treatment rooms, sensory unit and an art and drama facility;
-
The conversion of the site's three Grade II Listed Buildings, (Passmore Edwards House, Milton House, and Pearman House) to ancillary office accommodation;
-
The re-provision of the Chalfont Assembly and Packing Service (CAPS);
-
Retention of Hood House and the Art Centre;
-
Retention of five residential units off Tate Road;
-
Retention of Skippings Farm, together with the demolition of a number of subsidiary buildings currently forming part of the farm complex.

ii)   The Enabling Development
This element comprises 218 dwellings for sale, to include 20% affordable housing contribution. This residential development is proposed to be located on the land to the southeast fronting Rickmansworth Lane.

In addition, the enabling development will comprise a private nursing home and a sheltered housing scheme, both of which will be the subject of a separate disposal to the enabling residential development.

  In their Newsletter No. 2, Mr Faulkner said for the NSE:
"All we are trying to do is create a standard of accommodation [for our residents] acceptable in the 21st century."
 

That was in December 2003. The planning application submitted in May 2004 now refers to a complete site redevelopment, encompassing accommodation, 'associated facilities', staff accommodation, internal and external infrastructure etc.

Of course the Planning Officer can only comment on what he sees in the formal application, not the representations that the NSE has made to the public.
     

PARISH COUNCIL
Objections:-
Site in Green Belt. NSE has not proved that their needs (including the need to use the Green Belt) are special enough to warrant building on the Green Belt. There is, at Chalfont St Peter, the narrowest Green Belt between the metropolis and the countryside. To allow this development would set a dangerous precedent for other Green Belt sites locally.

Sewerage will be severely overloaded; it is overloaded now (flooding of High Street area every winter). Although Thames Water will claim that the present sewers are sufficient to take more housing, in reality it is known that Thames Water has no intention of upgrading the main sewer through CSP because the cost is too high.

Proposals are very high density and not in keeping with the surroundings in this part of the village. The need for this density has not been proved.

Vehicular Access to the site itself is inadequate for the additional traffic that will be generated. Access through the lanes surrounding the site is inadequate for such a development and it will be necessary for Bucks County Council to check very carefully before they advise Chiltern District Council that these lanes are sufficient to accommodate the extra traffic.

Local Infrastructure is inadequate for this development. There are not enough facilities (schools, doctors, shops, roads, sewerage) for such a development.

Out of keeping with the local area. The scale and mass of the development would be incompatible with the general character of the area and would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

  The Parish Council objections are clear and well stated.

Councillor Denis Palmer spoke on behalf of Chalfont St Peter Parish Council to the CDC Planning Committee on 2 September 2004.
Text of Councillor Palmer's speech.
     

REPRESENTATIONS
There have been 399 letters of objection to the proposal and a petition of opposition with 1816 signatures
Summary of concerns: These primarily relate to the enabling development: erosion of Green Belt, change to character/amenity, high density housing, pressure on infrastructure, traffic increase, congestion and highway safety, environmental damage, excessiveness of profit sought.

Green Belt
-
Building on Green Belt land is objectionable in principle, fundamentally wrong
-
Loss of green field areas where locals walk dogs and enjoy the countryside
-
NSE is raising more money than it needs and this greed should not be an excuse to build on Green Belt land
-
Erosion/destruction of the Green Belt
-
Will be a precedent for future development on Green Belt land
-
The NSE's site cannot be justified on the grounds that it is a hospital site and therefore has a unique claim to be exempt from Green Belt policy. Development will lead to irrevocable harm to the Green Belt.
-
Development of the site will create a precedent of further developments on the NSE property. Additionally this development may set a precedent for future development on Green Belt sites.
-
Resultant loss of amenity to neighbouring villages.
Housing
-
High density, increase in population and traffic will degrade area
-
Size and density of development is out of keeping with existing neighbourhood.
-
The housing development is too cramped, with its high density
-
The housing development is out of keeping with the open space and
-
The density and scale of development is not in keeping with the area
-
Development overbearing to neighbouring properties
-
Light and noise pollution
-
Adverse effect on the local community and ambience of the area
-
Infrastructure/services such as the sewers, water supply will be overloaded
-
In breach of Policy GC1, GB2, GC3, GC5, GC6, GC9, TR1, TR2 and TW3 of the Local Plan
-
The community facilities are already at capacity, such as dentists, healthcare centres, local schools, this will make the problem worse
-
No significant shopping or leisure facilities in immediate vicinity and no public transport. Will require new residents to use cars frequently.
-
Lack of community recreation facilities to accommodate young people.
-
Increased demand on refuse collection services.
-
Sheltered housing, why need it here?
-
No need for affordable housing in this area
Highways
-
Safety of pedestrians, particularly children walking to and from school will be further compromised by the increase in vehicle movements as a result of the development.
-
Proposed access to site unsuitable and dangerous for large increases in vehicle movements. Suggestion that a far safer access point would be opposite Nortoft Rd where more land is available and there is a clear view of approaching traffic.
-
Traffic onto Rickmansworth Lane will become more unacceptable
-
Surface flooding after periods of heavy rainfall on roadways causing possible traffic disruption exacerbated by increase in traffic.
-
Narrow country lanes surrounding the NSE and those roads leading to the A413 are unsuitable for 500+ extra vehicles. Rickmansworth Lane and Gorelands Lane are used as rat runs to get to Rickmansworth, Watford and the M25.
-
The roads are inadequate to support the proposed development. Large number of vehicle movements created will cause huge problems in and out of the proposed development as well as around the surrounding area.
-
Chesham Lane and Denham Lane are 'rat-runs', this development will make the roads more dangerous compromising highway safety.
-
The overcrowded roads will be even busier, and cannot support more traffic
-
Possible traffic calming measures on roads as a result of extra traffic.
Footpaths/wildlife/trees
-
NSE have poor management of existing walking paths and trees
-
Proposed parking is insufficient to cope with the additional 500-600 cars
-
No ecological assessment provided, no assessment of cost to the environment/wildlife
-
The removal of mature trees will be detrimental to the character and appearance of the area.
Reduced wildlife activity and numbers.
Other issues
-
It is difficult to accept the need to demolish relatively new buildings and the erection of more to provide accommodation for fewer residents and staff.
-
The cost per person stated by the NSE to comply with National Care Standards Committee is an unbelievably high figure - £228,000. Proposed development will not require the vast sums of money the NSE claim. Apparently a lot of money will be spent knocking down and rebuilding existing buildings on different sites. Are there not other ways to finance the redevelopment of the NSE?
-
NSE's Developments in recent years. 1985 - Opened Sarcus Dean as a halfway house for recovering patients. 1995 - New MRI facility. 1999 - Book binding and printing building. 2002 - Sir William Gower's Assessment Centre. All these facilities were built without the need to sell Green Belt land.
-
The problem the NSE is trying to solve: Stated problem is the requirement to upgrade the National Minimum Care Standards. Will not be upgraded at a reasonable cost. Proposed solution will acquire an excess of facilities to those required to meet the National Minimum Care Standards.
-
In the space of 10 months the estimated cost has increased by seven million pounds or 28%. The area of Green Belt land has increased by six acres or 37.5%. Concern that if current proposal is allowed to go ahead, then the NSE will demand more development to follow to continually upgrade facilities.
-
Disruption of daily life due to construction works.
-
Apparent lack of any considered approach to the development.
-
Existing residents burdened with costs from the development that should be met by NHS
-
Significant loss in existing property values.
-
Disruption from builders and trades people for several years while construction takes place.
-
No guarantee that local essential workers will benefit from increased housing.
-
Proposed development will not serve the need for accommodation in peaceful and stress-free surroundings by existing users of the NSE.
-
Underhanded tactics by NSE to reduce public opposition to the development including submitting application over a holiday period and twin tracking.
-
Development is morally wrong
-
NSE has been financially mis-managed for years and this proposal is intended to overcome this mismanagement at the expense of the local residents
 


399 formal letters of objection is substantial, as is a petition containing 1,816 signatures. It should be noted that the petition was circulated when the NSE were proposing a scheme to raise £25Million - they then showed their disregard for public feeling by increasing their 'cash requirement' to £32Million.

sense re-state that we agree the care residents should get better accommodation. We think it should cost around £7-9Million and not £32Million. But the £7-9Million scheme is not up for planning permission, only the £32Million one. As it is not possible to oppose part of the application we have to oppose it in its entirety.

     

78 letters of support. Most letters of support are from people with family members who suffer severe epilepsy and the letters describe their lives and how the centre has improved their quality of life, but how the facilities are substandard. Also facilities of this calibre are few and far between in the UK.
- Facilities and housing have started to deteriorate, better facilities and accommodation will improve the environment for the staff and residents of the NSE. It is a very important facility.

- People with epilepsy are entitled to a decent quality of life and this place has significantly helped those suffering to achieve this.

- NSE provides an essential element of health services at little or no cost to the Government and they have to find their own funding. This is an essential facility for those with epilepsy.

- We should be grateful for their contribution to the community and they deserve support.

- Our son has severe learning disabilities in addition to epilepsy and has lived here for 5 years, rebuilding is necessary to bring the facilities up to 21st century standards.

- If the centre had to close/move it would cause great trauma for those who live here, in my opinion some may die. To those who object I would ask yourself that epilepsy can be caused by even minor accidents and some opposing could find themselves in need of assistance from the centre.

- Where would my family member live if the centre closed? There are some very vulnerable residents who are at your mercy.

- If the centre were not here I don't think my brother would be alive today

- Rebuilding and modernising of the centre is required by law. If the NSE is unable to proceed, then residents would find themselves at great risk, there are very few alternative units of such a high standards for the care of people with epilepsy.

- My son has a broken shoulder and has no room to fall in his room. He always hits something and has broken his leg 3 times. People with epilepsy deserve a decent quality of accommodation and standard of living.

- The NSE has made substantial changes to ensure the residents are afforded the dignity they deserve, staff numbers have increased and there is a growing emphasis on rehabilitation, with the aim of ensuring that people who live in Chalfont return to living in the outside world. There is a growing feeling that everyone is being held back by the age of the facilities.

- The enabling development is the only way to fund the required re-building of the centre.

- Resident has lived at the N.S.E. for 30 years, and does not have anywhere else to live.

- Centre provides a crucial service of residential care for those affected. With altered twenty first century standards the current facility is out of date.

- Of all the land in Chalfont St. Peter, with clearly defined boundaries, this land can be developed without too much damage to the principles of the Green Belt.

- The NSE is able to assist suffers of epilepsy with gaining a quality of life otherwise impossible to achieve through rehabilitation and residential care.

- The NSE is a site of national importance, which provides people with very complex epilepsy a place of safety, therapy and respite.

 

As mentioned above, sense re-state that we agree the care residents should get better accommodation. They deserve it.

The issue is that the NSE have taken this good and deserving cause, aligned it with the new legal requirements of the Care Standards Act and then piggybacked a whole raft of other demands on to it.  The NSE say it is an 'All or nothing' scenario. sense disagree. But as the NSE have taken matters to a formal planning application we are left to agree all of it or none of it.






 


Some sense members have epilepsy - some have received (excellent) treatment and counselling from the NSE.
 
 
No-one wants it to close.
 
 

No-one wants it to close.

All that the NSE is proposing is not required by law. Furthermore, the elements that are required could be accomplished far more cheaply.

Agreed. No doubt about that whatsoever.



The care residents are supposed to be fully funded by local/central government. They have increased fees in the last couple of years and so have more funds available.

 
No, sense do not agree.
 
No-one wants it to close.
 
Completely agreed. This should have happened years ago.
 
sense, the Parish Council and Chiltern District Council do not agree with that.
 
Agreed.


Will the safety and respite be improved during construction and then with 850 new people/cars etc. on the doorstep?

     

Case submitted for the National Society for Epilepsy (NSE)
Documents submitted include:
- Executive Summary - case for development
- Supporting Planning Statement
- Assessment of Local Infrastructure
- Financial Appraisal
- National Needs Case
- Landscape Appraisal and landscape assessment
- Transportation Statement

Executive Summary - Case for the Development
The NSE, Chalfont St Peter is the only organisation in the UK which provides a fully comprehensive range of services for adults with epilepsy, including residential care for people with 'complex' or 'severe' epilepsy, and state of the art technology.

The NSE was established in Chalfont St Peter in 1893 with the purchase of Skippings Farm. Today the centre is home to 220 adults

The buildings are dated and fall short of the standards introduced in the Care Standards Act, 2000. If the NSE does not comply with these standards then the residential care homes will be forced to close by the Care Standards Commission. The NSE has been issued with a clear ultimatum in terms of achieving these standards.

The only viable option open to the NSE to raise monies required to fund the redevelopment of its facilities is to seek planning permission for development within its grounds and then sell the land to a developer. This is referred to as the 'enabling development'. The NSE is proposing up to 218 houses and 2 private care homes as an enabling development.

In arriving at the conclusion that an enabling development is the only option, the NSE has addressed all other possible scenarios. It is not possible for financial reasons to relocate. The financial work to justify this statement is addressed it in the NSE's National Needs Case and further supported by valuation work undertaken by ATIS REAL Weatheralls.

Supporting Planning Statement
The applicant draws attention to the following matter: Whilst the site lies within the Green Belt, the inspector at the last Local Plan Inquiry recommended that the majority of the site should have been taken out of the Green Belt. The parcel of land which was not proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt is well related to the urban area in any event, contained by existing built form and fulfils no strategic Green Belt function.

The NSE's 'very special circumstances' case is exceptional, and predicated on protecting a national interest. The need for improved healthcare provision is an important material planning consideration and also comprises very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

The application addresses the matter of a defensible Green Belt boundary and proposes strategic landscaping to the east, and an approach wholly in accordance with the aims and aspirations of the Colne Valley Park.

The proposal accords with all other relevant development plan policies; complies with PPG3 and PPG13 and will deliver a high quality built form.

Location and description:
The site is located to the northeast of Chalfont St Peter. This site's principal access faces directly onto Monument Lane and the site is bounded on its western side by residential development on Chesham Lane. The site is also contained on its southern side by residential development fronting Cross Lanes and Rickmansworth Lane. Skippings Farm marks the northern most extent of the built form.


The NSE has a land holding of 137 hectares, shown on blue line and the outline application comprises 20.24 hectares. The total foot print of all the existing buildings on site is 31,851sq.m and total floor area is 37,740sq.m

The Development Plan and History of Green Belt designation:
Bucks County Council Structure Plan:
Applicants have submitted representations on behalf of the NSE in respect of the emerging Structure Plan as follows: an objection that it contains no policy to support the provision and maintenance of social infrastructure. The NSE promoted new policy to state: 'the provision of new and redevelopment of land and buildings to meet the needs of the County's social infrastructure will be supported. Such infrastructure may include, but not limited to health and other community care facilities.'
Additions to Policy 8 to read 'operational land at the NSE complex at Chalfont St Peter to be taken out of the Green Belt to ensure development can be provided in the national and public interest.' And
'Any development within the Green Belt, other than appropriate development, will require to be justified as very special circumstances or as development in the context of Major developed site status'.

Adopted Chiltern District Local Plan - 1997 (including Adopted Alterations May 2001). The policies taken in to consideration are the General Criteria for Development, Housing Policies; and Green Belt policies, in particular GB2.

It is accepted that the proposed development is inappropriate and justification of the application rests on very special circumstances, in particular the requirement for enabling development and other material factors detailed later in their statement. In terms of the Green Belt considerations they highlight the relevance of the history behind the sites continued designation as Green Belt.

History of Site's Green Belt designation:
In the past, the Local Planning Authority, at officer level, has acknowledged that it would be sensible to take the site out of the Green Belt. This recommendation was endorsed by the Local Plan Inspector in September 1996, following a detailed consideration of the evidence. However, the recommendation was not accepted by elected Members on the basis that it was not felt that the site was able to provide a defensible Green Belt boundary.

The applicant draws attention to the point that this is a highly pertinent aspect of the sites history which has an important bearing on the Green Belt judgement that needs to be made at this stage.

The Planning Issues cover the following matters:
- The Green Belt and the NSE's very special circumstances case
- Transportation
- Compliance with PPG3
- Affordable housing
- The enabling residential development environment
- Local residential amenity
The Green Belt and the NSE's very special circumstances case:
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and therefore the NSE must demonstrate very special circumstances in order to justify the grant of planning permission as follows:

The very special circumstances case is based on the following:
i) the need for the development;
ii) the absence of harm to the openness of the Green Belt, the objective of the Green Belt policy and the purpose of including land in the Green Belt; and
iii) adherence to the Colne Valley Park's aims and aspirations.




Transportation:
Technical Issues: The Transport Statement by Denis Wilson Partnership concluded that there will be no prejudicial impact on the local highway network either in relation to access standards or the capacity of the local road network to cater for additional traffic. The Applicants are willing to enter into an agreement under Section 278 in relation to improvements to the junction with Chesham Lane and Rickmansworth Road to secure the benefit of a highway safety improvement.
Sustainability: The Transport Statement by Denis Wilson Partnership has addressed issues of sustainability advised by PPG13.

Compliance with PPG3:
Sequence to be applied to the Planning of Residential Development: With regard to paragraph 30 of PPG3 which advises in relation to the sequence to be applied to housing development, the application is entirely in accordance with prevailing government guidance. Accords with the fourth bullet point of paragraph 31 of PPG3.

A substantial proportion of the enabling development is proposed on previously developed land and buildings.

There is sufficient capacity in the existing infrastructure, including public transport, water and sewerage, other utilities and social infrastructure to meet the developments demands. We confirm that reasonable contributions related to the development, in accordance with Circular 1/97 have been costed in the enabling calculations.

Density: The enabling residential development exceeds 30 dwellings per hectare and therefore compliant with paragraph 58 of PPG3.

Housing Need: The Deposit Draft Bucks Structure Plan 2003 states that an allocation of 600 dwellings in Chiltern District is required between 2001 - 2006, and the enabling residential development contributes to the need for additional housing stock.

Affordable Housing: Application proposes a 20% affordable housing obligation.

Enabling residential development: Whilst this in an outline application only, the NSE confirms that the development will be of a high standard and will have due regard to the character of the area.

Local Residential Amenity: Whilst this is an outline application only, the NSE confirms that the development will not be harmful to the residential amenity of the locality. Landscaping is proposed, suitable distances from existing dwellings and appropriate access ways are proposed.

National Needs Statement
By Graham Faulkner, Chief Executive of the National Society for Epilepsy

The NSE is a registered charity (No.206186), founded in 1892, for the purpose of 'creating a home and industrial colony for such epileptic persons as are capable of work but unable to obtain regular employment on account of their liability to fits'.

Today the aims of the Society are encapsulated in its Mission Statement which states:- 'The NSE's mission is to enhance the quality of life of people affected by epilepsy by promoting research, education and public awareness and by delivering specialist medical care and support services.'

Deriving from the mission, the Society's primary objective is:-
'to provide both nationally and internationally for the maintenance, care, treatment, education, occupational training, occupation and employment of people with epilepsy'.

Other Epilepsy Centres: There are only 7 specialist centres in the UK. Apart from the NSE, none has a comprehensive range of services for adults with epilepsy. The NSE is a unique integrated health and social care centre; the only one in the UK providing assessment, medical treatment, research, care and rehabilitation on one site for adults with complex epilepsy.

NSE's Services:
Residential accommodation: The NSE is home to over 220 adults aged 18 - 90 with the most severe and complex forms of epilepsy. Because of the severity of their epilepsy, residents at the NSE are in the highest risk groups. They benefit from integrated, holistic medical and social care with immediate access to the most advanced epilepsy treatments in the world.

Other services include: day, leisure and therapy services; medical assessment and nursing services, research, information and advice. The centre has 573 staff and much of the accommodation for the staff is of poor quality.

Relevant standards - impact on the NSE:
The Care Standards Act 2000 introduced minimum care standards with which all registered care homes must comply. In 2001 the Society commissioned a report by Head Projects, a firm with experience in the design and redevelopment of care homes to provide an assessment of the layout and accommodation of all the Society's residential homes against the national minimum care standards.

The report received in October 2001 concluded that 'all of the existing homes are in sound condition and a reasonable state of repair having required some form of refurbishment over the last 10 years. However it went on to conclude that:

a. All homes will fail to meet the minimum standards required for disabled people
b. All first floor accommodation will fail to meet the minimum standards for accessibility
c. In four homes less than 50% of the bedrooms will meet the minimum standards size
d. In a further four homes less than 75% of bedrooms will meet the minimum standard size
e. The minimum standard required for wheel chair users of 12 sq.m in bedrooms and a combined communal space total of 17.1sq.m cannot be achieved'.

A letter from Gill Jeffers, The Buckinghamshire Area Manager of the National Care Standards Commission dated 7 August 2003 stated:


'Since April 2002, the inspections carried out at the homes on the NSE site have highlighted a number of areas where they do not come up to standard. Under normal circumstances a home would be set a requirement to put matters right within an agreed timescale. Failure to act may result in prosecution and ultimately a home's closure. The NCSC have been informed fully about the NSE's proposals for renovation and as such are in the process of agreeing necessary remedial work to be carried out while the renovations of the NSE become a reality, thus safeguarding the site's and service users' immediate future. I cannot emphasise enough the importance of this work going ahead. The future of the NSE and the people who live there depends on it'.

She went on to outline six specific environmental standards that the home failed to meet, namely:

Standard 21.3 Existing larger homes such as those at the NSE are to be organised into clusters of up to 10 people sharing a staff group, dining room and other communal facilities by 1 April 2007.
Standard 24.11 Premises need to meet Part 3 of the Disability Discrimination Act
Standard 25.4 Specifying the size of bedrooms
Standard 26 The requirement for bedrooms to provide sufficient room for two comfortable chairs, low level windows so that wheel chairs can look out and individually controlled heating
Standard 28 The requirement for shared spaces of sufficient size and design for shared and private use, e.g. domestic kitchens and laundry facilities and private spaces for visitors
Standard 28 The requirement to provide environmental adaptations and disability equipment, e.g. overhead tracking for hoist, stair rails, bathing equipment, lowered work surfaces etc.

Gill Jeffers concluded that the NSE fails to meet these six standards and that it is not an option for it to continue in its current form. In her opinion, if the standards are not met they would eventually be forced to close.

Assessment of Funding Options
The NSE have explored several options in order to fund the redevelopment of the epilepsy centre. The cost of the redevelopment is approximately £32 million and the Society's funding reserves falls significantly short of this amount. Examples from previous fundraising endeavours indicate that they could not raise the required funds in the required time frame, by 10 April 2007.

Options explored:
Fundraising: Approaches to Charitable Trusts, government grants. These options fall significantly short of the required amount;

Bank Loans: The loan repayments each year would be in excess of the NSE's net surplus. The debt from the loan could not be paid off. Notwithstanding, the finance houses are not willing to lend the NSE the cash without other security;

Relocation: Any alternative site has to be within 52 minutes drive of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in Queen Square, London. Evaluations have been carried out for the cost of relocation within 52 and 75 minutes drive time from the Hospital. The cost of relocating would be £80.79 million.

Disaggregation of the NSE facilities: Disaggregation of the NSE's facilities has also been considered. It should be noted that it is already proposed to dissagregate to a certain extent by reducing the residential provision on-site by around 45% or from about 272 places in 2002 to 152 places by 2010. Most of the functions must be integrated and only the administrative and services office and small works and gardening team could be relocated. No merit in this option.

The analysis of the financial options concludes that the only viable one is to balance the redevelopment costs of around £32 million by selling the 8.9 hectares of land for an enabling development.

Assessment of Local Social Infrastructure
The report states that that Chalfont St Peter and the surrounding area provides an appropriate quantum of social infrastructure to cater for the enabling development. The infrastructure report should be read in conjunction with the 'Workplace travel Plan framework' document. This addresses the sustainability of the site with regard to local transport infrastructure.

Within a 5 minute drive of the application site there is a full range of facilities to include shops, pubs, restaurants, medium scale super market, library, church, offices and the like. It provides sufficient facilities to sustain the day to day needs of the proposed new residents.

Broader Area: Within 10 minutes drive time. There are sufficient schools, dentists, doctors, chemists, convenience stores and supermarkets. For example there are 13 primary schools within a range of 0.6 miles and 2.9 miles.

Capacity: Of the 13 schools there is surplus capacity in 11 of them; there was capacity in 4 of the 10 secondary schools surveyed. 8 of the dentists surveyed had capacity. Of the remaining 5, 3 did not answer in time.

The development is compliant with the relevant provision of the development plan and the more general government guidance on sustainability in PPG1 and 13.

Landscape Appraisal
by The Landscape Partnership

Landscape appraisal includes the following:
- Existing site description
- Wider setting and views towards the site
- Local and streetscape setting and views towards the site
- Landscaping planning context
- Existing role of the site and adjacent land within the Green Belt
- Opportunities and constraints for the NSE and adjacent land

Site description
The site contains all the existing NSE buildings and amounts to 20.24 hectares (93.35 acres). The site is an irregular shaped oblong lying adjacent to the east of Chalfont St Peter.

Land uses
The NSE provides day and residential care for patients with epilepsy and other disabilities. The facilities allow for integration within the local community and the shared use of the sports fields and permissive paths. The NSE also contains buildings and structures to support facilities such as book-binding and horticultural activities to encourage patients to work with commercial based activities.

Buildings
The site contains 117 buildings of different types and uses.
Three are Grade II Listed; these include Passmore Edwards House, Milton House and Pearman House. It is noted that the three listed buildings have all been extended and the original main part is likely to be the only part to which the listing relates.


The immediate area around provides the setting for these listed buildings. The landscape elements include mature trees, open lawns, the entrance roads and adjacent land and the aspect of the view towards the properties. Passmore Edwards House is a focal point for the main entrance and is framed by a group of beech trees. As the rear elevations of these properties have been affected by changes it is the front elevations that are key areas for the setting. The other buildings include existing residential properties, buildings used for administrative purposes and others provide facilities for joint uses of the patients.

The maintenance buildings form a large collection close to Skippings Farm. These buildings are noted to vary in size and are described as being generally unattractive in appearance.

Vegetation
The site contains a number of trees some of which are noted to be mature specimens. A mixture of both deciduous and coniferous species has been identified and an arboriculture assessment has been undertaken to categorise the trees depending on their condition and worthiness of retaining. A number of trees have been identified to be of importance within the streetscape and overall setting. There is a Tree Preservation Order 5 (1990) named as a woodland in the south-west corner of the site between Cross Lanes and following the southern part of Rickmansworth Lane.

Existing accesses, footpaths and open spaces
The site has four access points as follows:- on Rickmansworth Lane, the Tate Road access lies towards the eastern corner of the site; the second access from a cul-de-sac to Sarcus Dean.

From Chesham Lane there are two accesses; the northern access is between Debenham and Victoria Houses and the southern access is the main entrance to the site. Both of these accesses lead into the central area of the campus and are linked by Nicholls Avenue.

The site is crossed by a north-south footpath from Chesham Lane past Skippings Farm onto Rowans Farm. A second footpath runs east to west and lies to the north of the site, although within the NSE and to the south of Skippings Farm. A permissive path has been introduced by the NSE within the site using Tate Road to lead towards Skippings Farm, and a second path follows the southern central tree belt and lies outside the site boundary.

The site contains a number of open spaces that vary between managed lawns, open grassland and areas used for sport and recreation and farming.

Wider Setting and Views towards the Site
This section outlines the boundaries of the NSE, the estate uses, topography, settlement patterns and infrastructure, vegetation, footpaths and bridleways and the distant views towards the NSE.

Local Setting and Streetscape Views towards the Site
It is noted that a number of the specimen trees and tree groups within the NSE are important as viewed from the local streetscape and local rural setting. The boundary vegetation provides important elements of enclosure and focal points within the streetscape and rural setting. The views into open spaces within the NSE are important for both the streetscape and the rural setting. It is the combination of these elements of vegetation and open spaces, which provide the existing character to the local setting and the current role of the NSE within this local setting.

Landscape Planning Context
Policies that have been identified as being relevant are GB1, GB2, GB3, GB30, R15, H4, LB1-LB4, GB28, R10, TW1, TW3, TW4, TW5, and TW6 of the Chiltern District Local Plan and SR1 of the Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan.

Existing Role of the Site within the Green Belt
It is stated that the most relevant purpose of the Green Belt to the area is to retain the separation to prevent coalescence of the settlements and to provide open space for recreational and agricultural purposes.

Opportunities and Constraints
The tree survey that has been undertaken in accordance with BS5837 (1991) categorised the trees from A to D. The A and B trees were identified to be high quality specimens that were worthy of retention, the C trees although slightly lower quality are also worthy of retention. All trees to be retained would need to be protected in accordance with BS5837 during all stages of demolition and construction works.

The landscape appraisal also identified the significance of a number of trees as viewed from the local rural and streetscape setting. These were identified irrespective of their A to D rating and providing they are not diseased or dying have been identified as important to retain as they make a positive contribution to the character of the area. In contrast, the row of conifers to the south-east of the playing fields are inappropriate to the character of the area and should be removed and replanted.

Any development that would lie close to the areas identified as playing an important role to the landscape close to the listed buildings would need to be designed to reflect the character and setting of the listed building.

The open land within the NSE and the adjacent land are considered to be important to the local setting and should be retained open. The open spaces of importance to the rural setting are additionally important in their role within the Green Belt.

It is stated that the existing boundaries to the west and south generally contain thick and mature tree belts. The eastern boundary of the NSE with the countryside is less thickly planted and in parts is open. There are opportunities to enhance the NSE as viewed from the east and around Skippings Farm and to reinforce the role of the NSE to provide a buffer between Chalfont St Peter and the adjacent countryside.

The young areas of planting along the eastern boundary should be actively managed to encourage growth.

Opportunities exist to enhance the facilities used for recreational facilities on the northern playing fields used by the NSE and local community for football.

The existing open areas of the NSE and the sports pitches are used informally by local people for recreational purposes including dog walking which has led to a high level of fouling and misuse. Opportunities exist to use the land within the wider NSE estate to promote access to the countryside and support the Green Belt and Colne Valley regional park objectives.

It is considered that a farm strategy should be established to explore the future uses of the buildings associated with Skippings Farm, which is a noticeable feature from the surrounding viewpoints

Within the NSE there are areas of open land which are contained visually and physically by the buildings and boundary tree belts. It is stated that these areas perform no visual role within the Green Belt and fall into two categories. The first is an area that is used by the NSE for informal recreational use. The land lies to the south of the central tree belt and is proposed to be used by the NSE for archery recreational activities and fund raising events. The second category are areas which have been identifies as being not actively used by the NSE and would be suitable for development subject to the retention of trees identified of importance.

These areas include the field which is managed between Sarcus Dean and Tate Road; the linear areas adjacent to the Cross Lane boundary tree belts; the open spaces adjacent to the areas for the listed building settings and the areas around Parry Cottages, Redsteps and Vulcan Houses

In respect of access points, a study has been undertaken and discussions with the County Highways Officer and the Chiltern District Council Tree and Landscape Officer have taken place. The location of a new access off Chesham Lane would require the removal of two hornbeam trees on the highway verge and a laurel hedge within the NSE site. An existing access to Sarcus Dean would be a second access point. It would be slightly modified to allow the existing road to divide and lead into the central area of the site. The Tate Road access would be limited to a cul-de-sac leading only to the four pairs of semidetached houses.

The landscape appraisal concludes by stating that a comprehensive approach to the NSE and adjacent site is being considered. It states that this would allow the wider estate to continue to be farmed, to used for horticulture and organic food production, the retention of formal and informal areas of land for the NSE, areas for open space for public use, the active use of land for enabling development and enhanced NSE residential development on land identified as suitable in the Landscape Appraisal.

The landscape appraisal concludes by stating that a comprehensive approach to the NSE and adjacent site is being considered. It states that this would allow the wider estate to continue to be farmed, to used for horticulture and organic food production, the retention of formal and informal areas of land for the NSE, areas for open space for public use, the active use of