|
Conclusion
1
The NSE does not require £32Million (or indeed anything like
it) to update its residential care homes.
Conclusion
2
The NSE must get its residential care division (RCD) at least to
break-even on a full life-cycle basis or, as a matter of policy,
use cash from fundraising to support it. It must not use land sale(s)
to create revenue from capital and deplete its asset base.
The RCD costs to be met must include periodic infrastructure replacement
(in the NSE's current proposal this is £32Million, sense
say £7-9Million) plus administration and overheads. Particular
care must be taken in balancing revenues and costs when the number
of residents falls from 250 to 152 as the fall in revenues appears
to be in the order of £2.5Million p.a. whilst the cost base
may fall by less than half that.
Conclusion 3
A modest scheme can be funded without major adverse consequences
or undue delay.
The NSE's proposal fails to do either.
|